The world discusses nuclear energy
]]14 March 2011 Nationality
]] Due to the explosions in nuclear power plants after the exhaust in Japan, the nuclear energy is questioned. [[T][4][[T]]
[[ The possibility of explosion and swelling in the nuclear power plant in the country after exhaust and expanding tsunami occurred in Japan, causing the recent comments of the nuclear age. [ In the UK Twitters, the news about cleaner and tsunami, which leads to large destruction in Japan. The British Guardian is subject that after the disaster in Japan, the United States, India, China, Indonesia, and Turkey’s environmental groups have been called to abandon or increase the security standards. Heberde was expected; " According to the Atomic Power Institution located in Vienna, around the world, the 442 percent of the commercial nuclear power plant in the faal case has been built in areas where there is an important degree of seismic activity. It is possible to build 350 new plants in 20 years to meet the growing energy requirement according to the bond, which means the risk of nuclear facia life as a result of natural disaster. " "Greenpeace Green Peace from India Karuna Raina was said to be the most healthy plants for clean-resistant and disasters from Japan. But see what happened. Sismic regions increased risk. Turkey is planning to build three nuclear power plants in Akkuyu. The area of the plant will be located in Ecemiş Fay Line, near several kilometers and in the region where large exhausts are in the past. ] Guardian writer Julian Glover also stressed that the fate of nuclear energy will be determined in Japan, if the situation cannot be controlled in the power, the trust of nuclear energy will be completely lost: " There are many reasons why nuclear facia in Japan should not remove or remove the world from atomic energy. It can be taken away from rationality in a negative way. No matter how few or how much results can be controlled if the reasons leading to Facia can be chosen, the assurances that the sector provides on safety, economic logic and climate change can go on a scary syndic cloud, which should build new plants to reduce the effects of change. We took years to cope with the spiritual results of Cheernobil. Don’t forget the fukuşima catastrophi Tags. Due to the potential to lead to a large destruction, the nuclear energy needs the public trust. " ]]]Support to BUCHAREST ENERGY The Pensilvanya in 1979, after loving years, he said: "A good security record occurred after the industry, Çernobil. This was Pyrolysis possible thanks to better design and tighter monitoring. Due to global warming, Western governments have started to look at the choice of nuclear again. Due to the uncertainty of energy safety, developing countries build nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants should play a certain role in poor carbon emissions. "However security concerns can stop the revitalization of nuclear energy at the West. Despite the load support to build new plants in the US and Europe, it is possible to add a space. Even a serious event, it can destroy support. After Çernobil, the International Atomic Energy brought strict safety rules. However, there are 20 years, these rules are still applied if desired. " As Times’s head is the only country that has taken under the lens, then the safety of nuclear power plants should be taken under the lens, "Despite being energy and the world leader in technology Who can do if Japans do not even make reactors that will be affected by disaster?"
Source: News