Environmental Engineers Chamber: Nuclear Risk Right In Our Side

TMMOB Environmental Engineers Chamber, which makes a written statement, reported that in the case of accidental in the nuclear power plant, planned to berried in Sinop as a result of the liquid distribution modelling work they do, will be affected by this accident in Istanbul, Ankara, Samsun, where large cities such as Istanbul, Ankara, Samsun will be affected by this accident, in the case of accident in the nuclear power plant plans in Akkuyu, all the Mediterranean region, as well as the major risk of Konya. Environment Engineers Room 10. In the statement made by the Board of Directors, the waste problem of nuclear energy has not been resolved, very risky, expensive and advanced countries are taken into account.

In Japan, clean and tsunami, which is located on 11 March 2011, caused by rotating power plant. Nuclear Risk, whichever of a result of ageing disaster, still continues. At the time of the bride, the level of danger was announced by the Cernobil and is necessary to enter the area around 20 km. According to recent reviews, it is calculated that the plant needs at the 30 years to stop its operations, and the cost of the procedure will find 19 billion dollars.

It is known that the hunger goes hard countries. Similar situation was experienced in Çernobil accident in April 26, 1986 Tags. Both Denmark (http://www.cmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/0eddf1a8cd5ef2d additional.gif?tipi=78&turu=H&sube=0) and models in France (http://www.irsn.fr/FR/popup/Pages/tchernobyl video nuage.aspx), It is observed that the factors emitted from Çernobil smear the largest part of Europe. After about 8 days in our country, it has started to influence from May 2, 5th of May, the Black Sea coast has been the concentrated frequency flow to our country.

This accident in a country with high-tech such as Japan has led all developed countries to re-review nuclear energy policies. After Germany and Switzerland, she decided to give up nuclear energy in Italy. As a result of the referendum, about 95 percent of the Italian people have no nuclear energy. Turkey; The process goes out by the government on the production of nuclear energy with Russia, where all this remains unexperienced.

A study was conducted in our room to determine how our country and will stay at risk in Akkuyu or Sinop, in case of a win like Fukuma or Çernobil. In this study; using the HYSPLIT (]]http://ready.arl.noaaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php, the only Particle Integrated Object Model) model developed by the U.S. -NOAA institution, the ways to track a liee serpinti that will be from Akkuyu and Sinop. For each 2 point, 4 days (96 hours) routes are determined in the atmosphere. This study was born for all the days spent in 2010 and came to results.

In the work done, the area of Turkey is divided into small cells, how much time (hour) spent on these cells from Sinop and Akkuyukuyu. According to the calculation of the results made for 2010, both Akkuyu, and the flowing force that occurred in Sinop will affect the largest part of Turkey. These effects have been found more intensively around every 2 points up to 300 km. In the study for Sinop, it is observed that the Black Sea Region is higher than risk of the North of the Inner Anatolian Region. In the last period, it will be one of the most risky areas due to the fact that approximately 20 million people live and the population density is the highest.

It should be shared with the public by the Ministry of Energy with a more thorough study inhaled 5-10 years of period and include comparisons.

On the other hand; Nuclear power plants near our border in Armenia and Bulgaria also provide large danger. If a similar study is done for these points, these plants will be shown to have a big risk for Turkey. In order to build the power plants in Turkey, it is necessary to perform international to welcome these plants.

We are waitingd below when we pull on energy:

Conduct waste is still the biggest problem

One of the most important problem of the plants resemble waste Tags. A nuclear power plant with an average power 1000 MW produces approximately 27 tons of high levels, 250 tons of medium level, 450 tons of low-end waste. These wastes and exhausted bars reduce the level of frequency by waiting in or next expansion of 10-20 years of reactor. While nuclear power plants are operating for the last 40-50 years, it should not be noted that there is no licensed final solution and storage space, for the storage and destruction of nuclear wastes.

It is mandatory that Nuclear Wastes are big problem in the "County Evaluation Abstract Report" by the US Energy Office.

was approved by the American Congress on July 9, 2002 as the National Nuclear Waste Warehouse of the Yucca Mountain located in the Nevada Province Tags. 27.3 Billion U.S. Dollars are calculated that the total cost of 77,000 tons of nuclear waste will be around 40–50 Billion US Dollars (1 ton ~ 500,000 – 650. 000 US Dollars. [email protected]

It is a separate problem to manage waste (canalization) and solid domestic waste according to to contemporary engineering norms in Turkey, how to manage nuclear wastes. The most obvious example of this problem is the International Atomic accident, which has been registered by the International Atomic Energy Authority as one of the major disaster in the world in İkitelli on January 8, 1999. [

The energy is abandoned by developed countries[

While advanced countries are giving up from Nuclear Energy Programs, this option is as a result of us. According to the opening of the U.S. Energy Office, in 2020 there will not be important change in the power of the Nuclear Power Plant Board on the Earth, but while the number of plants in developed countries is reduced, the new plants will be installed only in developed countries. According to these places, between 2000-2020, in the power of Nuclear Energy Board; 20.5% in North America, 18.2% in Western Europe, while expecting a reduction of 19.5% in the Soviet Union, an increase in 32.0% in Central and South America and 23.9% in Africa is expected. As a result, while getting rid of Advanced Western nuclear feed, this is wrapped in the way of developing commercial concerns.

In the last 30 years, wind power plant was installed on 35,000 MW while the nuclear power plant is closed at 9.764 MW capacity. 27,000 MW Wind Power Plant was established by flap the nuclear power plant in 6,000 MW in Germany, and 5600 MW Wind Power Plant was established by close the nuclear power plant at 4,000 MW in France, and 5,200 MW Wind Power Plant was installed in the UK by covered the Nuclear Power Plant at 3300 MW, and 20.000 MW Wind Power Plant was established in Spain.

The energy is expensive

As an expensive option of the energy agreement, Turkey’s future has been mortgaged. Turkey has guaranteed to purchase electricity for 15 years from a very high level, such as 12.35 cents from the Nuclear Power Plant Tags. Based on the average price of Turkey, Russia will pay $415 billion in exchange for kilowatt-hour electricity in 15 years.

The threat power from the reductor plant shows the same generosity for renewable energy sources. 08.01.2011 dated 27809 published in the Official Gazette "Renewable Energy Sources Law on the enforcement of the Law on the Use of Electric Energy Generation Purpose" and the electricity to be produced from hydropower and wind 7,3 cents/kWh, 10.5 cents/kWh to the electricity to be produced from geothermal sources, Biomass (including gas) and the electricity to be produced from solar energy, 13.3 cents/kWh price.

On the other hand, the electricity produced in Turkey is covered by 50 percent of the natural gas cycle plants Tags. The very large part of the natural gas, which plays the head role in the high electricity prices, is from Russia, as well as high-cost nuclear energy, also addicted to the country same, will increase energy retention in Russia. The electric bills that create very large payouts in the public, so will be more rough. [[

As a result, both Akkuyu, and a hunger in Sinop will affect almost all of Turkey. A plant to be installed in Thrace can be said that at Florenkuyu and Sinop will take risk. [

In such a critical decision, acting a lot of rushes without taking into account the scientific facts, the government who drags the future of our people to uncertainty by contacting civil society organizations and professional rooms that have shown over this regard. [

In this sense, we would like to emphasize that we will continue to inform the public in the light of scientific information and workmanship, as in previous periods, against the information pollution generated by powers that purpose to implement dirty energy policies.

]]Click to reach the details of theNews