Solution Not in Nuclear Clean Energy

]] is compiled from the WWF newsletter]

After the horrible exhaust and tsunami disaster in Japan, Fukuşima nuclear power plant ongoing concerns on human and natural environment, while nuclear energy projects are also required in the world. A large number of countries start to reclaim nuclear plans and programs, to review the existing or planned centers. Many countries reevaluate nuclear power plant plans due to disaster in Japan. After the EU member states come in Brussels, Germany will surely keep the existing nuclear power plants in the countries until the end of the year in Belgium, France, Holland and Austria, while the decision of close the power plants built before the 1980. Reevaluated nuclear power plans in Switzerland, England and China.

It is open to unusual dangers, with not being born, lying on nuclear power plant projects by showing the facts, social and environmental concerns that the incidents arise. In 1986, in 1999, is the most concrete examples of this. No matter how advanced technology, no country was accessible from severe defects and swelling leaks Tags. Radioactive pollution does not lead to massively sickness and destruction of all living creatures in the earth, through mutation passes the ad. There is almost no place where waste can be stored in the world. Only 50 thousand tons in the U.S. S., 12 thousand tons of waste in Germany, but not stored. Overall power is also remarkable. Technology can not be insured as the risk of nuclear plants, which are very high in construction and safety costs. In addition, since the construction times are very long, the planned costs can be folded in the process. If the energy is shown as a low rise magic recipe in the flap of the bottleneck, then the steps of the Soviet mining and enrichment require concentrated energy use.. As a result, the technology is determined at the bottom among low-carbon energy alternatives according to “safety”, “nuclear valuetion” and “collectal experiments”.

In Energy Report Published by WWF, nuclear energy is addressed as a “non-label and expensive” option. This is possible to pass 100% clean until 2050, the nuclear wastes are six years old. Due to its low carbon emissions, the nuclear energy shown as an option in the solution of the energy efficient is clear that it is necessary to note only to enter even when it is thought of waste problem. Japan requires a re-table reclaiming the nuclear energy policy of Turkey such a disaster, other countries. Having a clean country and in a unstable unusual care, it is necessary to carefully redistribute plans and projects related to Turkey’s nuclear energy. When the road is close, nuclear energy should be eaten and energy policies should be placed on a sustainable ground. Before depositing the dollar to the nuclear plants, we need to take into account a option such as allocation of these coins into sustainable energy technologies. [

WWF-Turkey Managing Director Tolga Baştak, “The nuclear energy offered as a certain environmental option meeting in energy demand and fight climate change should not be part of the clean energy package of the 21st century. The solution is not in nuclear, but in the circulation of clean energy sources and energy efficiency such as solar, wind and geothermal. [

][email protected]]