"The First Bridge was not built, the Third Bridge should not be done"

30.10.2008 bianet[[

]]

35 years ago, the first throat bridge, which opened, turned the axis of the city to the full reverse of natural development. The transport between two collars was tightened to the bridge and created the source of the problem we live today, says the city planer Hero: "O day's matches apply to the 3rd bridge plan today.

] [[T]“Boğaziçi Bridge is now one of the icons of the city. We had to accept it. We learned to live with the bridge if we count Istanbul’s stretch. However, we must stop at the wind of the 3rd bridge, so that the same errors are not compromised, the same coins are not spent. When of the two bridges, we showed us the need to ‘do not’. "[[T]] [email protected][

The Opening of the Bridge to the service was held in 35th, the Chamber of Urban Planningrs (SPO) Istanbul branch secretary Thaifun Hero “They were justified that they came across the construction of the bridge in those days. These subtitles today 3. we have to re-ascend for the bridge” says.

“The bridge is the invention of Buleyman Demirel. With this move, we see that the urbanization that lasts on the coast until that day starts to expand toward areas in the city. The route of the bridge if pushes this expansion. “

]]

The Hero that says that the production for the industry in the European side in Istanbul has been produced after the bridge, then this development indicates that the Anatolian collar.

[

“In the main frosted collar, the land and the incentive of the E5 highway are both residential and small-scale laundry are running to be installed. This is not accidental. After opening the bridge that gets the main axis of the development of this road. With these reviews, all the gangs of the city change. “

]

"For this reason, ŞPO branch secretary, the story of the "Boğaziçi bridge is the story of Istanbul. “

]]

]]35 years later our promise is the same: 3. no bridge!]]

Profile 3. The Hero, which expresses that the earlier appeal of 35 years in the conversations of the bridge, highlights that the claim "3. The bridge and the city to relax."

] [

“Today we count that the 3rd bridge is not required absolutely. When you look at the natural source. These limits are located in northern areas. These fields were already destroyed by making the bridge 2. Now we will cause the destruction of these areas with the 3rd bridge to do in its north.

]

“If the 3rd bridge is done, just like the Bosphorus and Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, a few years later, the Hero” states that the first two bridges have created environmental and economic destruction, and loudly 3. We must say no to the bridge.

http://www.bianet.org/bianet/kategori/bianet/110557/ilk-kopru-yapilmali
]

]]]]]]]]